Last week we watched the first 20 minutes of the above-mentioned film,
 produced by the BBC. The film opened with an image of bleached bones in
 the Namibian desert. The narrator identified the bones as the victims 
of a German extermination campaign that preceded the holocaust by 3o 
years or so. The narrator then explained that such "imperial victims" 
died as the result of a complex project conceived by many, not just 
militaries, including scientists, philosophers, writers, and religious 
authorities.
                                                                       (Source) 
The
 film then took us to Tazmania in the 1830s. In that decade, Great 
Britain decided to end slavery after battle fought by religious 
institutions and abolitionists (an abolitionist is someone that fought 
to end slavery). The scholar David Dabydeen explained that for 50 years,
 since 1787, "thousands of ordinary people" had organized to end 
Britain's role in the slave trade. Nonetheless, white Britain's still 
considered non-whites to be "little brothers." They were not equal.
                                                                        (Source)
Another
 scholar, Catherine Hall, added that culture and civilization became the
 new imaginative 'screen' by which the British measured equality. 
Perhaps non-whites would be equal to whites in the future, she 
summarized, but to reach that measure Britain would have to "raise" 
non-whites up to the "English level." Ironically, to accomplish that 
they would need utilize Christian missionaries to convert 
non-Christians. Thus, the same religious institutions that rejected 
slavery now gave impetus for colonialism. This process of colonialism, 
however the British justified it through spiritualized civilization, 
would destroy indigenous cultures around the world. This violent process
 of destruction via a complex colonization of other cultures is what we 
call imperialism. 
This imperial colonization, 
if that's not redundant, also gave the British discretion to 
"exterminate" those that they could not "civilize." Yet such 
exterminations would occur sometimes in strange ways, with some British 
practicing an outright method, and others, the religious, attempting to 
secure colonization and missionary conversions as an alternative. 
Slavery might have ended, but the painful appropriation of power from 
other cultures' labor and bodies had not. 
                                                                        (Source)
To
 demonstrate these parallel attitudes of British colonization, the film 
takes us to Tasmania, Australia, in 1803. (Note: this example begins in 
an era that precedes the 1830s battle to end slavery discussed earlier 
in this blog and the film.) The film observes that when the British 
colonists encountered indigenous peoples in Tasmania, they "saw people 
through ideas," and this 'screen,' or filter, helps us to understand why
 the British felt "disgust" and "shock" (indigenous refers to 
those peoples that called a place home before others arrived). The 
indigenous peoples practiced a radically different kind of culture than 
the British; the British, in turn, saw them as "left behind by history."
 They believed that they needed the British to help them. After all, in 
the "Great Chain of Being" that the British conceived, the "races" were 
arranged in an hierarchy, with the white British at the top. Colonizing 
and settling Tasmania - and these people - was their moral duty.
                                                                         (Source)
As
 you might expect, this process of colonization turned violent. Many of 
the indigenous peoples were displaced and abused. Bain Attwood relates 
how the struggle with white colonists over territory led to violent 
clashes. The British settlers, armed with sophisticated weapons, began 
to kill the indigenous peoples with the goal of wiping them out. This 
was genocide, or the practice of exterminating another group or 
ending its ability to reproduce according to the group's own desires. 
Kidnapping and rape became commonplace. Both groups came to view each 
other as "sub-human," or non-human. The film argues that this 
"non-human" demonstrated how "racial division tips into hatred."
                                                                       (Source)
With
 the indigenous peoples of Tasmania on the verge of "extinction," George
 Arthur, the British Governor of Tasmania," received orders to halt the 
annihilation. On orders from England, he began a campaign to 'rescue' 
the remaining Tasmanians and began to promote an inter-racial fantasy 
through colorful posters pasted everywhere (an early propaganda 
campaign!). He sent the Army to capture aboriginals, who in turn began a
 campaign of guerrilla warfare. He enlisted the help of George Augustus 
Robinson, a missionary who knew some of the aboriginals. Robinson sought
 to convert the aboriginals in order to save them. He wanted a peace 
treaty.
                                                                    (Source)
Lacking
 superior numbers and technology, the aboriginals knew that they would 
never end the conflict with the British settlers. They could never win 
in conventional war, and would never expel the British from their 
homeland. Fighting would lead to their extermination.
Arthur
 had Robinson send many of the remaining aboriginals to Flinders Island,
 with Robinson as their Chief Protector. On the island, they built a 
European-style settlement where they hoped to finally turn the 
aboriginals into British subjects. The film describes the settlement as a
 "factory" for "transforming savages into Christians."
                                                                      (Source)
Yet
 this form of settlement proved lethal. In combination with newly 
introduced viruses, the aboriginals broken spirits led to the death of 
the entire settlement, one by one. Children stopped being born. The 
health of everyone went to steep decline. Robinson fretted over the 
conditions of what we might call an unintentional "death camp," but 
salved his conscience by reflecting that the aboriginals had received 
the message of the Gospels. These beliefs protected him, as someone in 
our class noted, from any feelings of guilt. 
                                                                       (Source)








 
No comments:
Post a Comment